NHL Referee Conundrum

Consistency is arguably the most important quality of a referee. It’s too bad the 2011 NHL playoffs have been mired by inconsistent reffing.

The new rules after the lockout were supposed to free the game up for the skill players of the league and they have done just that. No more ticky-tacky hooking and grabbing. The elite players were allowed to be elite players again.

The early rounds of this year’s playoffs were a different story. It went back to the old rules. They might as well have had the police out on the ice because you had to assault someone in order to get a penalty.

Fast forward to the third round and suddenly the game has switched back to the regular season. In fact, at times it has been worse than the regular season. Penalty after penalty being called as players are constantly marching in and out of the sin bin. A player losing an edge seems to be enough to warrant a tripping call.

The players have no idea what to do. First they can get away with murder and suddenly a tap on the shin is a penalty.

There has been no consistency among each crew and frankly I’m sick of it. You all should be too.

Honestly though, the consistency line should be drawn where they call it during the regular season. All the hooking, holding and tackling should be out of the game. Let’s not give the game back to the grinders.

I don’t mind all the penalties as long as that’s how each crew is calling every game. Players need to at least know how the game is going to be called.

The Nashville-Vancouver series featured bad hockey. Not only are the Predators one of the most boring teams in the NHL but their defensive style was catered to by the referees who decided to lock up their whistles and throw away the key.

The San Jose-Vancouver series, on the other hand, has been dominated by the referees. Game 4 had the Sharks receiving 5 penalties in the first 25 minutes while that was followed by 3 consecutive 5 on 3 power-plays for the Canucks. The difference is astounding between what we saw in the first couple rounds of the playoffs.

I guess the NHL is consistent in its own way though. Their remarkable ability to consistently waver on key issues is always quite impressive. I mean, if they can’t set a precedent with the oh so important problem of head shots then why should we expect any standardization with their refereeing?

Related: NHL Head Shots

I was ready to call conspiracy in the Chicago series and prior to the 3 consecutive 2 man advantages I was ready to call conspiracy in game 4 yesterday. Well, it looks more like a product of bad reffing.

The NHL is your typical deadbeat dad. For some reason you always expect something more from them even though you realize that will never get anything. I have no idea why I still expect change for the better.

The great extent of this mounting problem isn’t realized by most people. Colour commentators and analysts should not be content with what is happening on the ice. Laughing off bad/non-calls and on a rare occasion pointing out a mistake sure isn’t going to invoke any change.

For fans to realize the problem on the ice, the one’s calling the games need to make it their business to show what is wrong with the refereeing. Once an outcry comes from fans and analysts maybe the NHL might start to listen. Okay, that might be a pipe dream of mine but it still shouldn’t be alright for people to be oblivious to or satisfied with the officiating.

The NHL has enough trouble generating an American audience and this year’s inconsistent garbage we see from the referee’s is enough to turn the casual fan away from the game. Fans have to know that this isn’t how the game is always played.

Call a penalty when it is a penalty. Sounds simple enough right?

Don’t let them play or call an excessive amount of penalties. The rule book is there for a reason so how about we have everyone follow it for a change?

It will not only make the game better for the players but more importantly it will make the game better for the fans.

Update: It didn’t matter because the Canucks took game 5 and are off to the Stanley Cup Finals. However, I failed to mention in the article below that the way the referee’s still call the overtime period is absolutely insane. On top of a game that was refereed exactly opposite to game 4, the overtime period featured 4 blatant penalties of San Jose’s and 1 blantant penalty of Vancouver’s that were not called. 2 obvious high sticks and 3 trips that my 85 year Chinese Grandmother could have seen. This isn’t an anomaly for the NHL because when it comes to overtime the whistles are put away. These refs decided they didn’t want to “decide” the game like they did in game 4 but they decide the game just as much when they choose not to call those penalties. Call the game the way you call it during the regular season. Call the game the way that you called it in the 1st and 2nd period. They’re lucky that they were in Vancouver and it took 3 brutally missed calls to get the “refs you suck” chant out of the stuck-up, corporate crowd. This is not the way that the 3rd and overtime period should be called yet the referees continue to stick to their old ways. I said it below but I have to say it again. Enough is enough, this has to change.

Agree? Disagree? If you have any questions, comments, suggestions, please feel free to reply in the comments section below. Or you can e-mail me at cross_can15@hotmail.com. Also, follow me on twitter @paintstheblack and I will gladly return the favour.

Subscribe to my blog too and you can get the latest posts such as Hierarchy Established?

About Chris Ross
Questions, comments, suggestions? Send yours to cross_can15@hotmail.com. Follow me on twitter @paintstheblack

5 Responses to NHL Referee Conundrum

  1. BackCheck says:

    Chris posted: Call a penalty when it is a penalty. Sounds simple enough right?

    And therein lies the rub. The rulebook itself is written to be interpreted subjectively. For example, Section 6, paragraph 42.1 Charging of the Official Rules states in pertinent part, “Charging shall mean the actions of a player who, as a result of distance traveled, shall violently check an opponent in any manner.” Say what? When is distance charging? What is a violent bodycheck as compared to a non-violent bodycheck?

    That’s just one but practically everything is left to the “opinion of the referee.” Given the Rule book, I’m surprised there is as any consistency at all.

  2. caniacwiz says:

    BackCheck throws out a valid point. Even if you go by the rule book, there is still too much gray area. Nevertheless, I don’t think officiating will ever become “consistent,” depending on what level you interpret that to be. At least, not in this day and age of hockey.

    P.S. Anyone else enjoy Kerry Fraser’s segment on TSN?

  3. This is an issue that’s gone on forever. I’m not going to say really anything at all about the refereeing, because I am so sick of seeing terrible calls over and over and over again. Once again, what on earth is Gary Bettman doing about this? Nothing.

  4. Pingback: NBA Playoffs – Where Legends Are Made

  5. G says:

    Absolutely agree with the arrticle and comments…I enjoyed watching the skill and speed of the regualr season, but the hacking, wacking and holding and grabbing of the playoffs completely ruined it for me to the point where I don’t have any desire to watch this again…I love hockey…but not the hockey that was allowed to take place in the playoffs (the San Jose not included).

    The playesr end up paying a heavier price physically and the end product sucks when the goons and grinders are allowed to take over.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,080 other followers

%d bloggers like this: